Tag Archives: Revolution

Towards New Industrial Revolution

LTG-logo - 1Goal: to start creating independent industrial sector, adding sustainable technology and solidarity economy to anarchist governance.

Tool: building long-term manufacturing, service and R&D facility, run by an experimental technological collective.

Opportunity: the need and resources available to provide goods and services to refugee and migrant communities in Europe. Continue reading Towards New Industrial Revolution

Sweeping floor in Thessaloniki

kouzina3It is the fourth weekend already, which we spend helping at the “Solidarity Kitchen” in the Migrant’s Center of Thessaloniki. Eight days spent on cooking, serving food, cleaning after the “customers” – the kitchen is open for everybody and the clientèle varies from more or less colourful migrants, through decent and face-keeping pensioners to the genuine street people – musicians, beggars, addicts and whoever is able to follow the smell of free food.
Today was a hard day. One of two cookers run out of gas, so the whole rhythm of cooking and serving (sometimes up to 150-200 servings a day) was spoiled. As we were waiting for the food to get ready, people were getting more and more nervous – the crowd was growing, instead of flowing peacefully.
Then there was a problem of diet change. Continue reading Sweeping floor in Thessaloniki

Revolution is sexy

Revolution is sexy. It tells you „let’s get to bed now, we’ll think about it tomorrow”.
And that is why so many people dream, think and talk about the Revolution – and so few practice it daily and on the regular basis. And those are mainly ones, who do not care about tomorrow, anyway.



The revolution starts failing the very next day after its victory. When it appears, that revolutionaries run out of shared views, and the new fight begun – to impose on everyone the only true and right order of things (MINE!). At best, it triggers the war of all against all, hopefully fatal for all involved, cleaning the area for less orthodox and more cooperative groups. In the extremely good circumstances (as it was in Greece after the civil war) all sides of the conflict are officially declared veterans and situation calms down.
The grim scenario is the emergence of single strong group, pragmatic, efficient and power-oriented. Having pacified all competition, such machinery is able to enchain community even more severely, paving the way for another, bigger bloodshed.


Luckier are revolutions, drowned in blood by oppressors. Fallen ones share their heroic status with a handful of survivors. Ideas, having avoided the reality check of victory, plant themselves in young generation minds together with myths of struggle and sacrifice. Sparks of revolution smolder, waiting for another chance. And the society at large benefits, as the ancient regime, freshly reminded about it’s fallibility, usually grants certain concessions.
After having their terms served, retired revolutionaries start writing books, describing how many reforms were introduced thanks to their struggle.


The revolutionists’ heaven is the forever revolution. Like a peat fire, it holds for decades. Cannot be extinguished, except with the A-bomb. But neither has the hope or energy to win. Political badlands, where swashbuckling individuals spend their gap years,
internships or just have part-time fun. In their thirties or forties they will already be somewhere else, and the fresh cannon fodder will replace them. Battles are sometimes won, but no side really wants to win the war, as nobody has any idea what to do next.


Revolutions never win. One can win a revolution.


It’s like getting an English lawn. You dig, you seed and then you keep taking care for next 300 years.
The real winner of the Egypt Spring, Muslim Brotherhood, started its way to victory in 1928, as an initiative to protect the rights of these days precariate – Egyptian workers exploited by international corporations. Since then, the Brotherhood changed its skin many times. Direct action, street work, cooperating with foreign powers – but they never left their social base, direct beneficiaries of the revolution: the poor and rejected. And when the time has came, people still remembered who was their long-term ally.


There are many who want the struggle – and just a few who want the victory. There is no wish for victory in these who made struggle their lifestyle. And they are on both sides of the front.
There is no wish for victory in these whose life (while oppressive) is still known and bearable. Better devil known, than unknown, they say. And this is the case for the majority of population.
Except for some desperados, no one will advocate the disintegration of a socio-economical structure, without compelling vision of reintegration. There may be, of course, that the life ceases to be bearable and ranks of desperados increase rapidly. As it is generally easier to make people unhappy, than happy, the strategy “the worse the better” tend to be popular among  revolutionaries, being considered stylish and rad.
The initial question every anarcho-positivist asks is “Do I want people, at large, to be forced – by suffering – to support my cause? Or do I rather prefer – due to principles I follow – to look for a way to gain their support some positive way?” And the answer is – I prefer to educate them, over terrorizing them.


Anarcho-positivism works for ‘the day after’ – for the time after the victory. And this is its way to improve chance for victory. To improve chance that people, freshly freed from the oppressive system, will try to build an unoppressive society, rather than replicate the jail they just escaped.
To an anarcho-positivist, the strategy of anarchism cannot be just a destruction. The new society will not shape up itself, nor it should be shaped by force. People need to be prepared and enabled to govern themselves on the basis of freedom and diversity.


Western republican and turbo-capitalist system is in deep troubles. Its logical response is to shrink – leaving less important areas alone, for the sake of better control over critical resources. Anarcho-positivism seeks for these cracks in the wall and plants seeds of free society there.


The best way to keep people subdued is to deprive them of knowledge and competences, replacing them with fake beliefs and specialized training – just enough to obey orders. Whatever improves the agency and self-governance, be it of a community
or an individual, works for the freedom.


Ability to live in freedom, being the political weapon of mass destruction, is built out of tiny blocks. Food independence, consensus-driven decision making, widespread technical skills and knowledge, critical and diversified education, knowledge of self-governance and freedom traditions.
All these pieces, harmless when separated, join together into a system killer – like a golden gun of Jose Scamaranga.


It’s not just about hackerspaces or fablabs. Every ecovillage, every cooperative, every intentional community can become a place for people to learn freedom. The daily education, with constant awareness of the goal. The most important are ‘full time’ communities, where people live on the regular basis – that’s why ecovillages tend to be so radical. But every ‘crack in the system’ community will be efficient, provided enough political awareness among its members.



The question that haunts every freedom (or anarchy) supporter is: what to do, if the very next day after gaining their freedom, people voluntarily start building another hierarchical system?
Anarcho-positivism answers: deal with it now – showing people practically, that it is better to live in freedom, than in oppression. And those who refuse – let them live their own way.


NO doctrine – anarchy included – deserves to be the one and only way for people to live. It is far more important to clean oppression out of the social life, than to preserve ideological purity. As old comrades say: overdoing worse than fascism.


For the unopressive society, we need an inert, equalizing political environment, in which various communities will float freely. Being a common good, this environment should moderate all aggressive actions and support peaceful interactions between
communities. Like a primordial protein soup, it would nourish and protect its dwellers. But to make it reality, we need raised awareness of many people and communities, and their SOLIDARITY in action.
Achieving that is the ultimate goal of Anarcho-positivism.


If we want to make the anarchist revolution a cause for people at large, we need to:

  •  help people to express their currently repressed needs
  • convince them that the unoppressive society will support their dreams
  •  convey skills and knowledge needed to achieve that.

This is the only way to make people WISH the revolution prevails and to make them colonize growing areas of freedom, being left by the shrinking system.
Otherwise, the anarchist idea will remain a toy for the handful of freaks and troublemakers – exactly as it is pictured by the mainstream media.

Read also  “The Protocol, or the primordial political soup…”

Special correspondence: ERT and the historical moment

Now, 6 days after the totally stupid decision of shutting down ERT, people in Saloniki seems to be a bit confused. We must be aware, that the position of ERT journalists before the closure was clear – popularly they were considered faithful servants of the regime. People here say: “we were throwig them away, they were our enemies.”. But as it is usually, more and more of technicians, journalists, even administration people in ERT were silent allies  of social movements, now sharing two major enemies: the government & Troika.

That was probably the core reason for the decision of restructurization ERT into “smaller,  more manageable” entities. The process, so to speak, to separate sheep from goats and provide better control over official information channels. Other, private broadcasters are already 120% into the neoliberal narrative and will be more than happy to support any stance government may take to protect their investments.

At the same time, people in Greece expect soon the elections to be announced, as a way for currently ruling group to escape from the growing chaos. Also, major shift towards fascism is expected. That would justify that rapid move – having ERT in the lengthy process on reconstruction and election campaign at the same time would probably produce very inconvenient results for the ruling class.

Meanwhile, the rage and frustration of ex-employees triggered by the arrogant decision, gave the shocking result: for couple days ERT, slowly being blackouted from official channels, sending their programs mostly over Internet, become really public television – for the first time, independent initiatives were presented, people from prominent communities – like famous VioMe – were interviewed. And Greeks started supporting their broadcaster. But two days ago PM sent a teasing message – “a small number of people could be hired to produce news and current affairs programmes until a new public service broadcaster is set up.”.  At the same time ERT people lost their initial momentum, and they apparently  did not get enough community support to develop their unified political position: ERT was always divided and animosities between administration, journalists and technical staff were kept and fed as a way to control people. Now, with a decoy from the PM, it may be really hard to build any consensus.

And, as the very ERT people gets confused, so do supporters. They say “they want us to protest, to demonstrate, to support them. But noone invited us to their assembly. They are closed.” And the support is gradually droping.

At the same time the moment seems to be historical. The state is falling apart. As a natural reaction, fascist movements gain the ground, especially in the police and army. But also among citizens who do not see any – other than the state – protection against poverty, uncertainty, humiliation.

ERT will not keep the Greek state  from sliding down the slope. Those, who obediently accept positions given by the government, will be regime’s cannon fodder. Despised by citizens, selling their souls for a decreasing dole of privileges, will be thrown away when the state – new, strong state – gets its legs again. If not, they will be easy sacrifice to the revolted masses, buying some time for their masters to escape.
This is the recurring story, in every country, when the political situation is at the verge of revolution. I saw it couple times in Poland.

But ERT people can push Greek cause of freedom onto new level. And this is the historical chance for them. This is the first time, when a government entity proclaimed actual rebellion. And this is the chance to open a way, to give an example of migration from bankrupt state sector to solidarity based social movement. If ERT – or at least part of ERT people – goes that way, they will make strong precedence, for all other state agencies.

It is clear and simple: every day you make a choice. And one day your choice may be to leave the house of slavery and to join those who are free. I really hope ERT will lead the way – we all need it.